Refuse minor variance application MV 63/25 by S. & D. Farmer (rear yard setback)

That application MV 63/25 by S. & D. Farmer, be Approved on the grounds that the requested variances are minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By law, subject to the following condition: That this variance applies only to the rear yard, as generally sited and outlined on the applicant’s submitted plans (refer to Attachments 2, 3 & 4 attached to the staff report to the Committee of Adjustment, dated December 10, 2025). 1. Lost Moved By Sakshi Sood Joshi Seconded By Denise Rundle That, based on the recommendations in the staff report citing prevalent concerns regarding privacy and the impact on the surrounding neighbourhood, application MV 63/25 by S. & D. Farmer, be Refused on the grounds that the requested variances are not in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. Committee of Adjustment Hearing Minutes December 10, 2025